RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM Spring 2011
Standard SIRS
16 198 552 01 53907 NATH BADRI
ENROLL= 37 RESP= 29 (78%) STRONGLY STRONGLY # OF MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN
DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE BLANK OF OF OF OF
PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 RESPONSES SECTION COURSE DEPT LEVEL
1. The instructor was prepared for class and
presented the material in an organized manner 0 0 0 2 25 2 4.93 4.93 4.37 4.35
2. The instructor responded effectively to
student comments and questions 0 0 1 3 24 1 4.82 4.82 4.56 4.55
3. The instructor generated interest in the
course material 0 0 0 7 21 1 4.75 4.75 4.36 4.34
4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward
assisting all students in understanding
course material 0 0 1 4 22 2 4.78 4.78 4.53 4.51
5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 0 0 1 11 11 6 4.43 4.43 4.38 4.36
6. The instructional methods encouraged student
learning 0 0 3 11 15 0 4.41 4.41 4.13 4.10
7. I learned a great deal in this course 0 0 2 12 15 0 4.45 4.45 4.22 4.21
8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject
matter and wanted to take this course 0 0 5 9 14 1 4.32 4.32 4.09 4.07
POOR EXCELLENT
9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the
instructor as 0 0 1 5 22 1 4.75 4.75 4.31 4.29
10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 0 0 1 11 16 1 4.54 4.54 4.25 4.23
PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR
11. 0 0 0 0 0 29 0.00 0.00 4.75 4.75
12. 0 0 0 0 0 29 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00
13. 0 0 0 0 0 29 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00
14. 0 0 0 0 0 29 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00
15. 0 0 0 0 0 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
16. 0 0 0 0 0 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
17. 0 0 0 0 0 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
18. 0 0 0 0 0 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19. 0 0 0 0 0 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00